Where is the Cosmic Revolution?
The Big Bang is Dead. Dissenters were right; but why not seen in Science News Media?
The February 22nd article publication “A population of red candidate massive galaxies ~600 Myr after the Big Bang” in the prestigious journal ‘Nature’, ought to be the nail in the Big Bang coffin.
If only it were so.
In the past six months we have seen the complete collapse of the tenants with which the cosmological redshift hegemony constructed their Big Bang theory.
The James Webb Space Telescope deep field images of July 20th 2022 smashed the ‘Dark Ages’ paradigm, a volume of space directly after the big bang that was supposed to consist mostly of primordial particles, an epoch before the evolution of stars and galaxies.
The JWST absolutely discredited that theory, plainly showing a volume of space smack full of garden variety spiral galaxies replete with second generation stars, over a billion years old, all this occurring within 180 Million light years from a supposed Big Bang.
In what fantasyland does nature create billion year old stars within 180 million years?
The answer is of course, in the Big Bang cosmological community. This is a conglomeration of respected academic cosmological institutions, their belief system supported by prestigious science journals, peer review boards and an entourage of science journalists; all of them dedicated to stifling any dissent that might oppose the Big Bang theory to the point that not a single paper has allowed to be published that opposes this interpretation of the cosmos for over a decade.
If one takes the time to study this topic in the media over the past six months, one can follow the almost comic slavishness with which most of the so-called science journalists hang upon every word that these cosmological buffoons have to say about the revolutionary deep field images, while running roughshod over the likes of Erik Lerner (his 1991 book “The Big Bang Never Happened”) or any dissenter who raises their head.
Shortly thereafter came the laughable attempts at saving the Big Bang by ‘discovering’ population three stars, which immediately got debunked because no such evidence exists.
Now, in order to fill this inconvenient 180 million era gap, these same discredited cosmologists in a comical act akin Shakespearian witches around a cauldron, pour in super black holes and dark matter into their toxic mix. Utter fantasy, no substantiation.
In any sane scientific community this kind of hand-waving behavior would immediately be dismissed as fanciful twaddle, But in the Big Bang cosmological community it is considered par for the course.
And they are getting away with it.
Sadly, it appears that there are no strong, organized voices of opposition to gainsay these fanciful imaginings that ceaselessly bombard the media, and few science media journalists to report on such voices, lest they be ostracized by the big bang cosmological cadre.
None of them dare address the fact that the emperor has no clothes: That the Big Bang is dead.
For these reasons, it is extremely hard for alternative voices to be heard, lest they be accused of being heretics, ostracized and shunned by this ridiculous, yet worshipped Big Bang cadre that by any reasonable measure ought to be tarred, feathered an run out of the science community on a rail.
These opposing voices have sparse, little known outlets such as ‘Plasma Universe’ and ‘Thunderbolts’. Few, if any papers published here are mentioned or referenced in cosmological Big Bang journals. Besides which, right now parts of that alternative community are temporarily in turmoil as one of their foremost voices, Wallace Thornhill is silenced by his recent passing.
Youtube videos that have the great advantage of allowing commentary, yet rare is the occasion that one finds counter arguments to the cosmic buffoonery that blithely support the Big Bang theory. Almost without exception, these Big Bang presentations never make a single reference to the James Webb Deep field images, as if they never existed or what amazing significance or import.
The organizations that do exist, such as the Electric Universe are essentially a collection of individuals that actually know something about electromagnetism and plasma behavior repeatedly make the correct prediction but, aside from publishing in obscure journals and creating YouTube presentations, they are successfully kept in obscurity, largely thanks to the vast bulk of science journalists who are essentially stenographers for the Big Bang cadre, who faithfully repeat this complete twaddle word for word.
And how could they know any different, these poor dears? They largely remain completely immune from feed-back, because their online publishings don’t allow public response. Perhaps some of them can be forgiven, being completely in the dark - but it is a poor excuse.
Perhaps this sad state of affairs might eventually change; there is always the hope that truth will out eventually. What is frustrating, is the amount of time this will take, and right now that doesn’t look good.
Stephen Goodfellow 03/04/23